Feel the difference

I am always amazed by how confident the keyboard managers feel about telling the manager what he should do in terms of selections, tactics and substitutions.

I have been watching Charlton since 1953, albeit with a gap in the middle when I was bringing up a family of three in the Midlands and we had left The Valley.    Yet I feel that I know little about football (other than the economics and finance and even there I am outpaced by chartered accountants).

I think that the periods when I watched football in the 1950s and the last few years are particularly irrelevant.   Let's start with the 1950s:

• The pitches were atrocious and the game was played with a heavy leather ball  A key skill was to skim the ball across a puddle.
• Training was a joke   Players were denied the ball as it was thought it would make them hungry for it at the weekend.  Training focused on running up and down the East Stand steps or round the pitch supervised by trainer Trotter wearing a white coat he had probably borrowed from the pharmacy counter at Boots.   There were even 'training walks'.
• Players weren't that fit anyway.  No one had any idea about nutrition and players would often have a fag at half time.
• The formation was set up as 2-3-5.  The full backs were defenders and often cloggers   There were two wingers up front, but the role of the wing halves was nothing like a modern midfielder.
• Keepers were supposed to stay rooted to their line and Bartram got criticised as a showman because he anticipated the modern sweeper keeper.   Keepers had far less protection and players were allowed to shoulder charge them.
• Referees weren't very fit and Jimmy Seed thought that a lot of them always favoured the home side. Nevertheless, my mother was convinced that there was a referees' conspiracy against Charlton and was always ready with a shout of 'dirty red', followed by an invitation to the referee to make a quick return to his home town (usually 'oop north).